Ban For Websites
Some websites are closed by government for some reasons.Well, do they have this right? Namely,can they close the website completely because of its content?Also the internet world is so wide that we can find things we look for on the other websites.Can they prevent this?So, closing a website doesn't mean to prevent using its content.However, it is sometimes necessary but all websites which include the same content sould be banned.For instance, some websites are harmful for pc or some are harmful for children.Such sites should be prevented not to harm anybody.But some websites are closed for so ridiculous reasons like youtube.Millions use it everyday for different reasons.To close such site isn't acceptable for me.
Buying Without Paying
Downloading MP3s,films or other software programs from the internet without paying any money is accecptable for me.Because if it was given to the internet it means that it would be taken into consideration that it could be downloaded.So, you cannot ask someone why he downloads them.Also their originals are so expensive.If we want to them, either we will have to pay much money into these or we will have to have so limited music or film cds.And also the internet is more reachable compared with the orginals.We know that they are products of particular labors and their owners want to get their money but iff they want these they should sell them cheaper and shouldn't give them to the internet.
Outline for downloading for free
Thesis Statement:Downloading MP3s,films or other software programs from the internet without paying any money is accecptable.
Reason for 1:If it was given to the internet it means it would be taken into consideration that it could be downloaded.
Reason for 2:If we want to buy their orjinals, either we will have to pay much money into these or we will have to have so limited music or film cds.
Reason for 3:The internet is so more reachable that you can find it when you want.
Opponent's argument:They are the product of a particular labor and ones who products them deserve to get their labor money.Downloading isn't an ethical and legal attitude.
Refutation of opponent's argument:If it isn't legal it should be banned and if the artists want to get their earning they should sell cheaper and shouldn't give them to the internet.
Reason for 1:If it was given to the internet it means it would be taken into consideration that it could be downloaded.
Reason for 2:If we want to buy their orjinals, either we will have to pay much money into these or we will have to have so limited music or film cds.
Reason for 3:The internet is so more reachable that you can find it when you want.
Opponent's argument:They are the product of a particular labor and ones who products them deserve to get their labor money.Downloading isn't an ethical and legal attitude.
Refutation of opponent's argument:If it isn't legal it should be banned and if the artists want to get their earning they should sell cheaper and shouldn't give them to the internet.
Living in More Places
Living in more places is a life style that everbody must have, compared with living in one place.Before everything it enables you knowmore people, different cultures and different life styles.You have many friends thanks to this.Living in the east and west of Turkey, for instance, enables you know different cultures.Even knowing dialects of different places adds you many things.It helps you learn to challenge with difficulties.You are sometimes with your family but sometimes alone.You may not find any people to help around you.And so you learn to challenge with difficulties even how it difficult it is.And also it shows different sides of the life to you and thanks to this you achieve different perspectives.Living in one place may enable you to live with your family.But you can't live with your family throughout your life.Maybe, you may think if you live in one place, you have permanent friendships.But being permanent of your friendships entirely depends on you not the place where you live.As a result, living in more places is better in many aspects.
Elective or Must
One of the courses that we took for English Language Teaching is literature.Most of us dislike that course though there are ones who like.It makes us think if it should be must or elective.For me, it should be both must and elective.
It should be must because to know some basic information about literature is necessary to be a good teacher and to teach effectively.
It shuold be elective because after basic information it isn't necessary for an English teacher.Namely,poetries,stories or novels and analysing of them is necessary for literature teaching.If you have information about these you can choose and learn it.But that it is must and it is tried to be memorized can just be a torture for some students like me.So,it should be elective after given some basic literature information.
It should be must because to know some basic information about literature is necessary to be a good teacher and to teach effectively.
It shuold be elective because after basic information it isn't necessary for an English teacher.Namely,poetries,stories or novels and analysing of them is necessary for literature teaching.If you have information about these you can choose and learn it.But that it is must and it is tried to be memorized can just be a torture for some students like me.So,it should be elective after given some basic literature information.
Euthanasia
Eythanasia is one of the important problems that we face today.Most of the legal systems don't allow to apply this.And I also think that it mustn't be applied.
One of the reasons said by supporter of it is that medical costs are high.This cannot be a reason to kill someone.Today, if people want, they can find money for so many things that they can find for recovery of their loved ones.There are a lot of charities or other voluntary organizations from which they can find money all over the world.So, that medical costs are high doesn't allow anybody to kill someone.
The other reason said by supporter of euthanasia is that the family suffers.It is so selfish for me.If you really love that person you do everything you can.Maybe, that he suffers gives youu hurt but if you have hope to recover of him you don't want to allow him to die.As a result, that the family suffers or that caring or looking after him is hard doesn't give anybody right someone to kill.
The final reason is that there is no chance of recovery.But there is always a chance even if it is too little.Nobody can know this.There are many examples of people who recover after many years.For instance, a man in China fell into a coma because of gas poisoning and he recovered after he had remained in coma for 13 years.That was called as a miracle exactly.So, that cannot be reason to kill somebody.
As a result, even if it is little, there is always a chance to recover.So, families should be patient and wait.They shouldn't allow them to die.
One of the reasons said by supporter of it is that medical costs are high.This cannot be a reason to kill someone.Today, if people want, they can find money for so many things that they can find for recovery of their loved ones.There are a lot of charities or other voluntary organizations from which they can find money all over the world.So, that medical costs are high doesn't allow anybody to kill someone.
The other reason said by supporter of euthanasia is that the family suffers.It is so selfish for me.If you really love that person you do everything you can.Maybe, that he suffers gives youu hurt but if you have hope to recover of him you don't want to allow him to die.As a result, that the family suffers or that caring or looking after him is hard doesn't give anybody right someone to kill.
The final reason is that there is no chance of recovery.But there is always a chance even if it is too little.Nobody can know this.There are many examples of people who recover after many years.For instance, a man in China fell into a coma because of gas poisoning and he recovered after he had remained in coma for 13 years.That was called as a miracle exactly.So, that cannot be reason to kill somebody.
As a result, even if it is little, there is always a chance to recover.So, families should be patient and wait.They shouldn't allow them to die.
Outline
Thesis statement:Living in more places is a life style that everybody must have,compared with living in one place.
Reason for 1:It enables you know more people,different cultures and different life styles.
Reason for 2:It helps you learn to challenge with difficulties.
Reason for 3:It shows different sides of the life to you and thanks to this you achieve different perspectives.
Opponent's argument:Changing place isn't always better.If you live in one place you don't have to leave your family,you have permanent friendships and you encounter fewer problems.
Refutation of opponent's argument:Living with family may be good but you cannot live with them throughout your life.You have to leave.You can have many friends if you live in more places but being permanent of your friendships entirely depends on you not the place where you live.And also, life is full of problems.You cannot get rid of them -no way.So you have to learn to challenge with them by encountering them.
Reason for 1:It enables you know more people,different cultures and different life styles.
Reason for 2:It helps you learn to challenge with difficulties.
Reason for 3:It shows different sides of the life to you and thanks to this you achieve different perspectives.
Opponent's argument:Changing place isn't always better.If you live in one place you don't have to leave your family,you have permanent friendships and you encounter fewer problems.
Refutation of opponent's argument:Living with family may be good but you cannot live with them throughout your life.You have to leave.You can have many friends if you live in more places but being permanent of your friendships entirely depends on you not the place where you live.And also, life is full of problems.You cannot get rid of them -no way.So you have to learn to challenge with them by encountering them.
Kaydol:
Kayıtlar (Atom)